![]() The -soft option won't touch the index file nor the working tree at all (but resets the head to, just like all modes do). This would make sure I'm not losing any private file (not added to the index). Any changes to tracked files in the working tree since are discarded), I would rather go with: $ git reset -soft HEAD~3 # (2) Note: due to the "destructive" effect of a git reset -hard command (it does resets the index and working tree. Switch to " topic/wip" branch and keep working.Īgain: new way (since 2019 and Git2.23) to do all that in one command: git switch -f -c topic/wip HEAD~3.The distinction between the two is in the noun they act on, so that should be included in the drop-down: Remove File. Coming from git, I know the difference, but I still need to stop and think about which one I actually want each time. Rewind the master branch to get rid of those three commits. When you right-click on a file, you're given the option to 'Remove' or 'Discard,' two synonymous verbs.You want to continue polishing them in a topic branch, so create " topic/wip" branch off of the current HEAD. You have made some commits, but realize they were premature to be in the " master" branch.Thats because Git itself doesnt commit unless you explicitly tell it. $ git reset -hard HEAD~3 # (2) NOTE: use $git reset -soft HEAD~3 (explanation below) If you dont set that option, the files appear in SourceTree as uncommitted changes. When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts and mark the resolved paths with git add (or git rm if the merge should result in deletion of the path).Īs mentioned in the git reset man page: $ git stash # (0) Save your work in progress However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is done, and you will be on the new branch. If you have local modifications to one or more files that are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. Or, as suggested in Alia's answer, use git switch -m, without git stash: git switch -c topic/wip -m ![]() # Then, one command to create *and* switch to a new branch It takes both staged and unstaged changes, saves them for further use, and then returns them from your working copy. Git stash saves the uncommitted changes locally, allowing you to make. With Git 2.23+ (Q3 2019), the new command git switch would create the branch in one line (with the same kind of reset -hard, so beware of its effect): # First, save your work in progress! viw stashed changes sourcetree mean How to. Or, in one command: git checkout -b newBranch If you hadn't made any commit yet, only (1: branch) and (3: checkout) would be enough. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |